W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Datatypes - help please

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:59:55 +0100
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200303261459.55682.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

I am trying to understand what I need to change in the test document to 
reflect WG decisions vis-a-vis datatypes.

I believe I should be working from Ian's text in

I have some minor additions  (see * * text)

OWL Consistency Checkers

An OWL consistency checker takes a document as input, and outputs one
word: Consistent, Inconsistent, or Unknown.

An OWL document is Consistent iff there exists some MODEL of the
document that is consistent with the constraints specified by the
relevant MODEL THEORY (*see ASS <link>OWL Lite and OWL DL</link>, <link>OWL 

An OWL consistency checker MUST return "Consistent" only when the
input document is consistent and "Inconsistent" only when the input
document is not consistent (this property is usually called

An OWL consistency checker is COMPLETE, **with respect to its
supported datatypes**, if, given sufficient (but
finite) resources (CPU cycles and memory), it will always return
either Consistent or Inconsistent **(for an input document
that does not use any unsupported datatypes)**; 
otherwise it is INCOMPLETE. It has
been shown that for OWL Lite and DL it is possible to construct a
complete consistency checker (the languages are DECIDABLE), and that
for OWL full it is not possible to construct a complete consistency
checker (the language is UNDECIDABLE).

An OWL consistency checker SHOULD minimally support at least 
the following XMLS datatypes: integer, string.

is that enough?
is there a link for the word "support" in the last paragraph to S&AS?

I would continue with the exact characterisation of the five consistency 
checkers agreed at the January f2f (text largely unchanged from current WD).

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 08:59:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:52 UTC