"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > Comments on Overview and Guide > > (I'm waiting for the new version of Reference before providing comments.) > > - title - I changed to > OWL Web Ontology Language > Semantics and Abstract Syntax > on the suggestion of Jim Hendler. This makes it clear that OWL > is not a misspelling of an acronym. I suggest that we again > revisit the idea of a common way of naming the documents. is this the new consensus on titles? i do not have a strong opinion other than the documents should be consistent. the overview is currently following the last agreement that i thought we had on naming conventions. the current title is: Web Ontology Language (OWL): Overview if this is the new consensus, then I am happy to name the document OWL Web Ontology Language Overview and a followup question is are we having any version information on the top of the documents? thanks, deborahReceived on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 21:04:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT