At 10:47 AM -0500 6/24/03, Dan Connolly wrote: >Dave didn't find our response satisfactory. >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0068.html > >Jim, Guus, pls consider > - finding more rationale for the status quo that we might > use to convince Beckett > "Maybe you do have multiple interoperable implementations of > the mapping from OWL's concrete syntax (RDF triples) to OWL's > abstract syntax and I am just unaware of them. If that is > the case, then I would be more satisfied." > > - re-opening issue 5.26-OWLDLSyntax >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.26-OWLDLSyntax > > >Otherwise, I guess we can add Beckett to the dissenters on issue 5.26. > >Maybe this merits telcon time this week? > > This will be on the agenda in some form - I need to decide if this is a new issue, a reopening of an issue, or what. Also, Sean, do you think your reverse mapping document could become "a real document" (I'd suggest informative agenda to S&AS) if we got you some help on it? That seems to me to be the most responsive thing to this comment, and a valuable document for implementors -JH -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:01:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT