W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Proposed response to: inadequate reference in Owl REF

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:56:29 +0200
Message-ID: <3EF32EAD.8070401@cs.vu.nl>
To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0102.html

 > Owl Reference contains:
 >
 > [[
 > The following datatypes are NOT recommended for use in OWL (see for
 > details  the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax document [OWL S&AS]):
 > ]]
 >
 > I just hunted around S&AS and couldn't find these details.  Please
 > include a more specific reference, preferably a hiperlink.
 >
 > Brian

Brian,

Thanks for your comment. In the post-LC editor's drafts this discussion 
on recommenced datatypes has been moved from OWL S&AS to the RDF 
Semantics document.

We suggest the OWL Reference document simply lists the recommended 
datatypes and points for further details to the relevant section of the 
RDF Semantics document.

The link to RDF Semantics currently is:

http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_append.html#dtype_interp

but this will be updated at some appropriate later point in time.

Please let us know, cc-ing public-webont-comments@w3.org, whether this 
response is satisfactory.

Guus Schreiber

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 11:56:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT