W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

RE: proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:41:00 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDKELJCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


Do I have the OK to send this response?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll
> Sent: 11 June 2003 08:54
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: proposed response to
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.
> html
>
>
>
>
> (I thought I had seen a sentence from Peter on the NP complete
> problem, that
> should go in here appropriately too, but I can't find it right now)
>
>
> Dear Brian,
> concerning the comments of RDF Core in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May
> /0052.html
>
> > owlsas-rdfcore-np-complete
>
> We have accepted this comment and made appropriate changes to
> eliminate the
> embedding of the Hamiltonian Path problem.

See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0402.html
for decision.

>
> > owlsas-rdfcore-bnodes-restrictions
>
> We agree that there may be cause for concern, but note that the changes
> requested would minimally require a major rework of the direct
> semantics of
> OWL DL. (Section 3 of S&AS).
>
> We have created a new issue and postponed it, so that a future
> group may, with
> the benefit of deployment experience, assess whether these concerns were
> legitimate, and whether the quantity of work required to attempt
> to address
> this issue is motivated.

See
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I6.1-UnnamedIndividualRe
strictions



>
> We are still considering relaxing some of the constraints on bnodes
> corresponding to class expressions; however, this does not seem
> to be your
> main concern. We will notify you of any change.
>
> Please reply to www-rdf-comments to indicate if these responses are
> acceptable.
>
> XXX on behalf of WebOnt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 09:40:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT