W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Wine Ontology

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:58:40 -0500
Message-ID: <B8E84F4D9F65D411803500508BE32214168834C0@USPLM207>
To: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

Chris's response is exactly right.  Overdependence
on Emacs.  Fixed, will soon be the version linked
to the editor's draft.

Thanks, Charles.

- Mike

Michael K. Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
EDS - Austin Innovation Centre
98 San Jacinto, #500
Austin, TX  78701

phone: +01-512-404-6683
email: michael.smith@eds.com
  

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles White [mailto:Charles.White@networkinference.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:52 PM
To: webont
Subject: Wine Ontology



All,

I was reviewing the wine ontology and had questions about a couple things.
(Other than the winery named McGuinesso which seems to have been named after
a certain person at Stanford University and Congress Springs Winery which is
now named Savannah-Chanelle.) The other somewhat more relevant issue is that
at the end of the ontology is a list of <owl:AllDifferent> which contains
the following:
      <vin:Winery rdf:about="#Marietta" />
      <vin:Winery rdf:about="#Marietta" />
      <vin:Winery rdf:about="#Marietta" />
      <vin:Winery rdf:about="#Marietta" />
along with a bunch of other names, many of them repeated. Is that valid OWL?
Seems odd in that it logically it would be saying that a class is different
than itself.

chas
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 20:58:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT