I had a go; if this is clearer than Peter's text I can work through what impact it has on the abstract syntax and mapping rules - it's not a lot, but it's not nothing either. I think it is clearer. The abstract syntax is important because that's what the semantic hangs off, and the concrete syntax is important because that's what most people end up having to understand. If this description of the concrete syntax is intelligible then making a few semantically neutral adjustments to the abstract syntax and mapping rules is justified. Jeremy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:04:58 GMT