W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: HP reactions to AS&S and OWL

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:30:55 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f35ba49f862a13e@[]>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

At 17:07 +0000 1/14/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>I have been talking with immediate colleagues about where OWL is at, 
>particularly the OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full layering.
>The current reactions are not positive.
>I'll first discuss process, then sketch the substantive worries.


>I have been unable to defend the chairs' enthusiasm for skipping CR; 
>when we have so many unimplemented features in OWL. I can easily 
>imagine a scenario in which OWL rushes to PR, some non-WG member 
>objects that we have insufficient implementation experience; my AC 
>rep asks for my opinion and I have to say that the objection is 

I'm confused Jeremy - we saw ample examples of implementation of OWL 
tools at the f2f, and I'm still not sure what features of Lite you 
believe are unimplemented.  I asked several times at the f2f for 
people to bring up things they think are as yet unimplemented but 
needed for moving to PR, and very few were mentioned - my lab took 
two actions to produce some of this.  You brought up none and 
volunteered none.  I have been drafting some starts at the 
implementation experience, and I don't see any major holes -- please 
identify any you have so we can start to fill them

Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 12:34:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:50 UTC