W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: review of Guide (clarificatons)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 08:54:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030106.085450.60020762.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: michael.smith@eds.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>
Subject: RE: review of Guide (clarificatons)
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:39:11 -0600 

> > > > NOTE: wine.owl does not have a locatedIn restriction for wine.
> > > 
> > > Does it need it?
> > 
> > There is at least one example not marked as not being from wine.owl or
> > food.owl that uses locatedIn.
> 
>   <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="locatedIn">
>     <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;TransitiveProperty" />
>     <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/@@/owl#Thing" />
>     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Region" />
>   </owl:ObjectProperty>
> 
> locatedIn is defined as above.  Wine has no locatedIn restriction, but
> wine is a Thing.  Burgundy is a thing restricted to the location
> BourgogneRegion.  Does this not work?
> 
> - Mike

The point is that the in-line example in the Guide that has a locatedIn
restriction on Wine is not part of wine.owl, and thus should be marked
accordingly.

peter
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 08:54:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT