W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: review of Guide (clarificatons)

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:39:11 -0600
Message-ID: <B8E84F4D9F65D411803500508BE3221412CE471D@USPLM207>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

> > > NOTE: wine.owl does not have a locatedIn restriction for wine.
> > 
> > Does it need it?
> 
> There is at least one example not marked as not being from wine.owl or
> food.owl that uses locatedIn.

  <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="locatedIn">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;TransitiveProperty" />
    <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/@@/owl#Thing" />
    <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Region" />
  </owl:ObjectProperty>

locatedIn is defined as above.  Wine has no locatedIn restriction, but
wine is a Thing.  Burgundy is a thing restricted to the location
BourgogneRegion.  Does this not work?

- Mike
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 15:39:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT