W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

RE: the relationships between OWL species

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:29:39 +0100
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

> I believe that it is the intent of the working group that all OWL DL
> documents are OWL Full documents, which is what 2/ goes against. 

I certainly intended to convey that ... can you give me a test case please?

i.e. an OWL DL document that is not OWL Full by my wording.

I would regard that as an error.

Received on Monday, 17 February 2003 06:31:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:51 UTC