W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: the relationships between OWL species

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 06:41:47 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030217.064147.90226957.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: seanb@cs.man.ac.uk, www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: RE: the relationships between OWL species
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:29:39 +0100

> > 
> > I believe that it is the intent of the working group that all OWL DL
> > documents are OWL Full documents, which is what 2/ goes against. 
> > 
> 
> I certainly intended to convey that ... can you give me a test case please?
>
> i.e. an OWL DL document that is not OWL Full by my wording.

...

<owl:Class rdf:ID="owl:xxx" />

....

is an OWL DL document, but not an OWL Full document.

> I would regard that as an error.
> 
> Jeremy

peter
Received on Monday, 17 February 2003 06:43:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT