- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 06:41:47 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: seanb@cs.man.ac.uk, www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: RE: the relationships between OWL species Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:29:39 +0100 > > > > I believe that it is the intent of the working group that all OWL DL > > documents are OWL Full documents, which is what 2/ goes against. > > > > I certainly intended to convey that ... can you give me a test case please? > > i.e. an OWL DL document that is not OWL Full by my wording. ... <owl:Class rdf:ID="owl:xxx" /> .... is an OWL DL document, but not an OWL Full document. > I would regard that as an error. > > Jeremy peter
Received on Monday, 17 February 2003 06:43:20 UTC