- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:34:26 -0500
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jos De_Roo wrote: ... > > the actual problem I had was that it is > either > > :foo owl:imports <http://example.org/ontology>. > <http://example.org/ontology> rdf:type doc:Work. > > or > > :foo owl:imports _:ontology. > _:ontology rdf:type owl:Ontology. > > and I prefer the latter > with the dereferencing *explicit* via > <http://example.org/ontology> log:semantics _:ontology. > When I read the OWL Semantics concerning rdf:type, I see nothing that has to do with any of doc:Work log:semantics nor is there any requirement that the URI be of rdf:type owl:Ontology. I understand the above are N3 constructs, but I don't think this issue has anything to do with owl:imports as specified by the OWL Semantics. The fact that you removed your implementation of owl:imports was given as evidence that there is some problem with owl:imports. I don't see the problem with owl:imports itself -- i.e. when you are *implementing it* just dereference the URI and load the triples you get into the KB. Jonathan
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 07:57:27 UTC