- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:59:03 +0100
- To: jonathan@openhealth.org
- Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
> > The bug I found (via my implementation) with owl:imports > > is that it should actually be > > > > <some-uri#ontologyName> owl:imports _:importedOntology . > > <other-uri-of-a-doc> log:semantics _:importedOntology . > > > > There is a difference between a document and the thing > > written in a document (in this case an ontology). > > > > ??? I am lost on this one. I understand the distinction you are making but > what is the *bug* from a functional point of view. > > :foo owl:imports http://example.org/ontology.owl > > loads the triples obtained by parsing what is returned by dereferencing > http://example.org/ontology.owl -- what is the *actual* problem with this? the actual problem I had was that it is either :foo owl:imports <http://example.org/ontology>. <http://example.org/ontology> rdf:type doc:Work. or :foo owl:imports _:ontology. _:ontology rdf:type owl:Ontology. and I prefer the latter with the dereferencing *explicit* via <http://example.org/ontology> log:semantics _:ontology. -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 03:59:47 UTC