W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: owl:imports experience: took it out

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:14:33 -0500
Message-ID: <006f01c2d3be$0e551860$7c01a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>
To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>

Jos De_Roo wrote:

>
> The bug I found (via my implementation) with owl:imports
> is that it should actually be
>
>   <some-uri#ontologyName> owl:imports _:importedOntology .
>   <other-uri-of-a-doc> log:semantics _:importedOntology .
>
> There is a difference between a document and the thing
> written in a document (in this case an ontology).
>

??? I am lost on this one. I understand the distinction you are making but
what is the *bug* from a functional point of view.

:foo owl:imports http://example.org/ontology.owl

loads the triples obtained by parsing what is returned by dereferencing
http://example.org/ontology.owl -- what is the *actual* problem with this?

Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:37:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT