Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports

> >
> > Sure, let rdf:comment be applied to classes and properties, it is a
(data
> > valued) property *like any other*
>
> [...]
>
> But how?  Other data-valued properties cannot be applied to classes and
> properties in OWL Lite and OWL DL.
>

doh! aaarrrghhh... these sorts of things are going to make OWL-Lite
conceptually quite heavy, perhaps unbearably so :-(((

Jonathan