Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2003-02-13 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from February 2003)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:35:28 -0500 (EST)
To: jonathan@openhealth.org
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030212.213528.40088119.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Subject: Re: possible changes to abstract syntax and direct semantics to support annotations and fix problem with imports
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:45:09 -0500

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >
> > Because they can be applied to classes and properties.  If they can't, then
> > they are no different from data-valued properties.  If they can, then they
> > are are completely different category.
> 
> Sure, let rdf:comment be applied to classes and properties, it is a (data
> valued) property *like any other*

[...]

But how?  Other data-valued properties cannot be applied to classes and
properties in OWL Lite and OWL DL.   

> Jonathan

peter

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 21:35:41 UTC