- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 13:27:24 -0600
- To: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Cc: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:31, Deborah McGuinness wrote: > excellent. > i think to publish we need a resolution on to be clear: the WG is *not* in the critical path for publication. When I (or rather: Massimo) hears from Deb & Frank that it's ready, we're to publish, per last thursday's meeting. You can leave editorial notes ala "this bit needs work" or you can decide you're not comfortable publishing, I suppose. But the WG delegated publication to Deb/Frank/Dan. (And Massimo has the ball on my part.) You're welcome to solicit advice. But if you don't get any, I'd like you to proceed anyway. > 1 - jim's request to take datatypes out and peter's request not to take them > out I think I saw a "pls disregard" from Jim on that. > 2 - the current addition of intersection of named classes only which is what > I understood was decided on the phone call and ian's and peter's > understanding of named classes and restrictions and owl lite. If it's not clear, just make a "some clarification of owl:intersection's role in lite is pending" note, I suggest. > 3 - franks updates today. > > frank has write lock Roger that. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 14:27:55 UTC