W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: yet more on QA

From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200312182220.RAA18019@clue.msid.cme.nist.gov>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com


>I finally found the QA assessment of the QA WG by the QA WG - they really are 
>amazingly brazen!
>
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2003/02/qaframe-ops-qawg

This is somewhat old.  Some of the issues it identifies have been
fixed in the CR version.  A big one is the availability of a QA Process
Document template. This template is an example of the kind of useful 
resources that our review comments encourage them to produce.  

I think it is encouraging that they are performing these 
self-assessments.  It is also to their credit that they are requesting 
reviews such as the one we just performed on the QA Operational 
Guidelines.  It is puzzling though, why they would let the document we 
reviewed get to a CR state given they have all these tools at their 
disposal.

-Evan

[QAPD-TEMPL] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/OpsET-qapd-20030912
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:20:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:03 GMT