W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Changes to make S&AS consistent with RDF Semantics document

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:57:28 +0100
To: "Sandro Hawke <sandro" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: connolly@w3.org, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, herman.ter.horst@philips.com, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF30452FBC.896467DF-ONC1256DFB.00401F45-C1256DFB.0041B4D7@agfa.be>

>> >Can you name one of these tests, or all of them if it's convenient?
>> >
>> Doing a text search on the extra large version of Test reveals
>> that the phrase XMLLiteral appears only in tests 201 to 205.
>> 205 speaks of Full and a datatype map without XMLLiteral -
>> which is impossible under Possible Solution 1
>> 201 and 202 include the case of Full and a datatype map
>> without XMLLiteral - again impossible under Possible Solution 1.
> But would they switch entailment/consistency by having XMLLiteral?

The test case manifest is explicit w.r.t. datatype support.
In a RDFCore test case manifest one says
  eg:yourTest test:datatypeSupport rdf:XMLLiteral.

and in an OWL test case manifest one says
  :hisTest otest:supportedDatatype rdf:XMLLiteral.

and the latter is even explicit w.r.t. no datatype support
  :herTest otest:notSupportedDatatype rdf:XMLLiteral.

The RDFCore and OWL test cases illustrate the designissues
to my satisfaction.

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2003 06:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:56 UTC