DanC: >spot-checking, I notice this one is missing a # in >xmlns:this="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/test001 " Oh yes. >Also, do the tests need to rely on xml:base? I think there is extra clarity in doing so. I've tried modifying one of the tests to not so, and we can compare. This one also doesn't 404. http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises001.rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions001.rdf Notice I have left xml:base declarations in, except that they are now innocuous. It permits the files to be copied easily. I am eager to avoid absolute URIs except in xmlns and xml:base declarations. I find the length very cluttering. The short relative URIs look OK to me though ... rdf:about="premises001.rdf#object1" JeremyReceived on Sunday, 28 July 2002 04:04:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT