W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: TEST: FunctionalProperty InverseFunctionalProperty 3.4 4.1

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 27 Jul 2002 10:07:06 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1027782427.13440.1007.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 22:49, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
> The links should now work.
> 
> i.e.
> The test files are:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I3.4/bad001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I4.1/bad001.rdf
> 
> showing the deprecated names, and
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises002.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions002.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises003.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions003.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises001.rdf

spot-checking, I notice this one is missing a # in

xmlns:this="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/test001" 

Also, do the tests need to rely on xml:base?

And please let's use the example domain if we're gonna
have namespace names that 404.


> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions001.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises002.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions002.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises003.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions003.rdf
> 
> showing the basic meaning of the terms.
> 
> Jeremy
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2002 11:07:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT