W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: ISSUE: enumeration classes (2.4)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Jul 2002 14:09:59 -0500
To: ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1027019401.27575.378.camel@dirk>

Do you mean to raise a new issue?

This looks an awful lot like an existing one...
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I2.4-Enumerated-Classes


On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 11:00, ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
> 
> is there a chance to have enumeration classes already in OWL lite?

yes, there's a chance; in fact, they're in DAML+OIL, so unless
we decide to remove them, we will have them.

> I think they 
> are quite common and easy to understand. The inferences they will be used in 
> are typically quite simple

There's quite a bit of subtlety there; see, for example, the
peopleKey test case I discussed in...

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0132.html

> (for instance consistency on the instance level: to 
> make sure that a slot can have a value only from this set).
> 
> Ruediger
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 15:09:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT