W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Lexical representations

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:54:14 -0000
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDAEBKCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> Unfortunately, I don't think that this does the trick.  An ontology
> identifier is, I think, a URI reference.  At least that is what the second
> requirement appears to be saying.
>

Ahh.

I think you are saying that the term "ontology identifier" is being used for
two different things. In the second req. as the identifier for an ontology,
in this req. as an identifier for some object within the ontology.

I didn't feel very comfortable with your "If ..." since that appeared to be
weakening the requirement to an optional one (although I don't think that
was your intent).

How about hacking "same ontology identifier" to be "same identifier of an
object within an ontology". It's a bit wordy, but I hope it's good enough.
i.e. the whole section being:


[[[
User displayable labels
=======================
The language must support specifying multiple alternative user displayable
labels for the same identifier of an object within an ontology .
This can be used, for example, to view the ontology in different natural
languages.
]]]
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 04:54:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT