The new version of the Requirements Document is now ready for your perusal. Please see: http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/owl/ The following issues are still outstanding, and need to be discussed at the telecon: 1) "Referencing with URIs" as raised by Peter Patel-Schneider. 2) "Ontologies as resources" as raised by Peter. 3) "Ability to state closed worlds." I was going to demote it to an objective as requested by Peter, but Pat Hayes subsequently argued that it was important. 4) "Properties for statements / Reification / Tagging" as raised by Peter. 5) "Lexical representations" appears to say that URIs have multiple forms (as raised by Peter). Need alternative wording here. 6) Removing "Integration of digital signatures." Peter doesn't believe it is appropriate for an ontology language, but Raphael Volz later aruged for keeping it in. 7) Mike Dean's new requirements (dated Feb. 19). I haven't had the time to consider which of these should be added. JeffReceived on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 22:40:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT