W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: REQDOC: ontologies as resources

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 16:10:24 -0500
Message-ID: <3C6ECAC0.CDBE84CB@cse.lehigh.edu>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
> PS:  What should we do with requirements that have no motivation?

We need to put a motivation for every requirement and objective. If we
can't find one, then maybe the requirement doesn't belong. I'm open to
suggestions. Currenty, these requirements are missing motivations:

1) local unique names aassumptions
2) ability to state closed worlds
3) cardinality constraints
4) layering of language features
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2002 16:10:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:47 GMT