W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

RE: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18

From: Smith, Michael K <michael.smith@eds.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:57:37 -0600
Message-ID: <B8E84F4D9F65D411803500508BE3221412B19119@USPLM207>
To: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

If you are taking a straw poll, I agree with Frank.

- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank van Harmelen [mailto:Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:12 PM
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18

Jim Hendler wrote:

> If the WG indicates that they agree with Peter and/or prefer this
> I will be willing to revisit our decision.  If not, then we can go to LC
> without the semantics document, and resolve this and release that document
> in LC form as soon thereafter as we can

If you're looking for support, than count me in as follows:
- I support Peter's objection (that last night's resolution lets
content" creep into descriptions)
- even if the semantics document could be fixed, it would still be 
unattractive (Peter Crowther's points on this were well made)
- going to LC without the semantics document would be unacceptable in my 

My first preference is Peter's proposal
and I would rather not have unique-names construction at all,
rather than going to LC without a semantics document.

Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 17:57:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:49 UTC