W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: oneOfDistinct, a proposal for 5.18

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:11:42 +0100
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <7905247.1040425902@[]>

Jim Hendler wrote:

> If the WG indicates that they agree with Peter and/or prefer this decision,
> I will be willing to revisit our decision.  If not, then we can go to LC
> without the semantics document, and resolve this and release that document
> in LC form as soon thereafter as we can

If you're looking for support, than count me in as follows:
- I support Peter's objection (that last night's resolution lets "assertional 
content" creep into descriptions)
- even if the semantics document could be fixed, it would still be 
unattractive (Peter Crowther's points on this were well made)
- going to LC without the semantics document would be unacceptable in my 

My first preference is Peter's proposal
and I would rather not have unique-names construction at all,
rather than going to LC without a semantics document.

Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 17:11:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:49 UTC