Chris: >I propose we revisit this decision, however in doing so we should also >take into account new information (that was not considered in the previous >vote) regarding the location of the 6th f2f. e.g. I put Manchester last in the vote because I hold the alternation rule important. But given the chairs' decision about ftf6 (which I support), alternation is not possible. On a revote I would put Mcr first. I agree with your earlier point that other European cities have not had a chance; but personally can't think of anywhere I would prefer to go than Manchester. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 12:36:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:04:53 GMT