- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:58:37 +0200
- To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Further to my summary of the contributions to public comments list, two new messages arrived today, both of which are also relevant to the semantics discussion also on the agenda for today: Message [1] points out a bug in the DAML+OIL spec that we are about to be bitten by as well if we don't take care. (Essentially the current DAML+OIL spec of sameClassAs forces its arguments to be of type daml:Class, even if without that statement they would only be of type rdfs:Class). Message [2] shows the confusion people have about the relation between RDF and OWL: is every OWL document an RDFS document (as our working documents state), or is it the other way around (as the author believes it to be the case). Food for the teleconf today. Frank. ---- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0022.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0023.html
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 07:58:43 UTC