W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: ADMIN: agenda for August 1 telecon

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:46:52 +0200
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFAEBAAC43.21ABDA23-ONC1256C08.006E06F4@agfa.be>

> > that's nice
> > I was able to run the cwm converted manifest test
> >   http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest.n3
> > "as is" (I mean no manual editing)
> > just a pity that your comments are lost in the n3 file :-(
>
>
>
> A couple of questions/points about the conversion
>
> 1: what happened to rtest prefix; it got truncated to ""
> which means (I think) that my rdf:ID="test001"
> instead of mapping to URL
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest.rdf#test001
>
> got mapped to
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema#test001
>
> or perhaps
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest.nt#test001
>
> (Crucial part of n3 file)
> <#test001> a otest:PositiveEntailmentTest;

oops...
I ran it again (this time fetching from the web)
  cwm --rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest --n3

and also
  cwm --rdf http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest 
--ntriples

and that is producing the triple
  <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/Manifest#test001>
  <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
  <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology#PositiveEntailmentTest> .

which is OK I think
sorry about the confusion, cwm is OK I think
(and I have trouble with ../../ stuff...)

> 2: Literal trimming.
> The whitespace in my rdfs:comments got reformatted in your conversion.
> (Not a big deal in this case)

Dan?

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2002 16:47:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT