- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Apr 2002 12:57:05 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 07:02, Jim Hendler wrote: [...] > 2) ACTION item review I see a few more... ACTION (Mar 28) DanC, Lynn Stein (prov.), Jos De Roo, to participate in RDF core discussions on construct for closed lists hmm... perhaps overtaken by action (Apr 8) : PeterPS + FrankVH + JeremyC write down a paragraph for RDFCore w.r.t. these issues [1) LIST 2) DARK TRIPLES] And this looked like an ACTION from the ftf records: (Apr 9) issue drive process -- ACTION chairs + MikeS > > ACTION (Mar 28) Chairs to clarify OWL naming problem > CONTINUES > > ACTION (April 9): chairs > Send message to SWCG to the effect that, to achieve aims in charter, > need a dark (unasserted) triple mechanism in RDF. > http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T12-40-23 > COMPLETED > > ACTION (April 9): Mike Dean, Enrico Motta, Ziv Hellman, Raphael Volz, > Ian Horrocks and Frank van Harmelen > Following polls on separation of language features between > level 1 (OWL-lite) and level 2 (OWL-full), a group was constituted to > revisit the level 1/2 conformance issue: > http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T14-08-19 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 13:57:04 UTC