W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics April 18 Telecon

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 17 Apr 2002 12:57:05 -0500
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1019066226.4817.82.camel@dirk>
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 07:02, Jim Hendler wrote:
[...]
> 2) ACTION item review

I see a few more...

ACTION (Mar 28) DanC, Lynn Stein (prov.), Jos De Roo, to participate 
in RDF core discussions on construct for closed lists

hmm... perhaps overtaken by 

action (Apr 8) : PeterPS + FrankVH + JeremyC write down a paragraph for
RDFCore w.r.t. these issues [1) LIST 2) DARK TRIPLES]

And this looked like an ACTION from the ftf records:

(Apr 9) issue drive process -- ACTION chairs + MikeS

> >  ACTION (Mar 28) Chairs to clarify OWL naming problem
> CONTINUES
> 
> ACTION (April 9): chairs
> Send message to SWCG to the effect that, to achieve aims in charter,
> need a dark (unasserted) triple mechanism in RDF.
> http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T12-40-23
> COMPLETED
> 
> ACTION (April 9): Mike Dean, Enrico Motta, Ziv Hellman, Raphael Volz,
> 		  Ian Horrocks and Frank van Harmelen
> Following polls on separation of language features between
> level 1 (OWL-lite) and level 2 (OWL-full), a group was constituted to
> revisit the level 1/2 conformance issue:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T14-08-19

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 13:57:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:49 GMT