W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 00:47:09 +0100
To: "Jeff Heflin <heflin" <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: "WebOnt <www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF6C17E29E.5ED315A2-ONC1256B8E.007EEFB3@agfa.be>

Hi Jeff,

> Could you please explain what you mean by "least power thing" and
> "triple integrated circuits." Thanks!

I would like to refer to our implementation experience
with triples in Euler [1], but I guess this is a bit
off-topic for this list ;-)
The triple is the basis class and all the rest is
derivations from triple combinations.
I think that always having ``subject predicate object''
is supporting meaningful derivations.

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

[1] http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/
Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 18:47:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:42 UTC