W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:33:04 -0500
Message-ID: <3CA8E020.2C34D2C3@cse.lehigh.edu>
To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
CC: "WebOnt <www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jos,

Could you please explain what you mean by "least power thing" and
"triple integrated circuits." Thanks!

Jeff

Jos De_Roo wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > What does it cost?
> >
> > 1) existing RDFS agents will not be able to understand your WebOnt
> > ontologies (they can understand small portions of DAML+OIL ontologies.)
> >
> > 2) people may need to convert existing RDF Schemas in order to use
> > WebOnt
> >
> > Honestly, that's all I can think of. Maybe someone else can suggest
> > more?
> 
> we find it very useful to have that "least power thing"
> and so to have stuff like "triple integrated circuits"
> (can't imagine to loose that)
> 
> --
> Jos De Roo
Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 17:33:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:49 GMT