W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > November 2001

schedule suggestion [was: Agenda...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:29:36 -0600
Message-ID: <3C065460.CF095146@w3.org>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: HENDLER@cs.umd.edu, www-webont-wg@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
> Subject: Agenda and Logistics - Web Ont WG Telecon - Nov 29, 2001
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:26:17 -0500
> > At 6:35 AM -0500 11/28/01, Jim Hendler wrote:
> > 2 - Schedule discussion (15 min) - Dan Connolly
> >
> > Dan Connolly has a proposed schedule for the working group, he will
> > present and we will discuss.
> > ---------
> I would really like to have a copy of this well before the call.

oops; quite...

I'm starting with the schedule in the charter
$Revision: 1.9 $ of $Date: 2001/08/14 00:03:43 $

I assume that implicit in the director's
decision to start this WG three months
later than the charter says is authorization
to shift the schedule by 3 months, so
that we can go thru Dec 2002 without rechartering.

Nov 2001
     Activity start and Working Group formation 

Dec 2001
     Publish "hello world" requirements/scenarios
        document, to (a) get the WG thru the
        process of publishing a W3C TR, and (b) to
        invite the review/user community to learn
        about us and get involved

        This document could/should cite related work,
        ongoing implementation projects, etc.

Jan 2002
     Working Group face-to-face meeting 
        -- have a draft document as input to the
        meeting *at least two weeks in advance* so
        that we can get together around the same page.

Jan/Feb 2002
     Publish initial working draft ontology Working Draft 
	(on http://www.w3.org/TR/)

Apr 2002
     Working Group face-to-face meeting 

May 2002
     WG meeting? I suggest not;
	I suggest we just focus on outreach.

July/Aug/Sep/Oct 2002
     (Candidate Recommendation for ontology product) 
     Proposed Recommendation for ontology product 

     (Jul-Oct is sort of a confidence interval;
	we'll be in a better position to predict
	when we'll finish after April or May.)

Dec 2002

  * I hope we can skip Candidate Recommendation; i.e.
        I hope we won't need a *separate* implementation
        phase from the design phase. I think there
	are sevel implementation efforts that will
	track our work as we go.

  * WWW2002 in May will be a big milestone. rather than
        scheduling a WG meeting at that time, I'm leaning
        toward making it an outreach event, when we show
        that this stuff works.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 10:29:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:40 UTC