W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > November 2001

RE: What shall we call the web ontology language??

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:30:00 +0200
Message-ID: <2BF0AD29BC31FE46B788773211440431621862@trebe003.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl, www-webont-wg@w3.org

He missed SWIL (Semantic Web Inference Language)  ;-)

Which logically would be paired with SWALLOW ;-)

Cheers,

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Frank van Harmelen [mailto:Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl]
> Sent: 22 November, 2001 23:05
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: What shall we call the web ontology language??
> 
> 
> Michael Sintek wrote:
> 
> >         SWOL  -- Semantic Web Ontology Language
> 
> Hans Akkermans (close colleague of Guus Schreiber and myself 
> here in Amsterdam), has done his homework. You can see the results at 
> 
> http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/names.html
> 
> There are more names to choose from there then we will ever need.
> 
> In response to this list, Shirley Tessler and Avron Barr have 
> suggested SOL (Standard Ontology Language), which is 
> currently also Hans' favourite.
> 
> I would have proposed XOL (XML-based Ontology Language). This 
> would have had the advantage of dis-antagonising the 
> folk-who-claim-you-can-do-all-of-this-in-XML, but 
> unfortunately XOL is already in use for an XML based ontology 
> language. 
> 
> So, take your pick from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/names.html
> (and don't forget about SOL).
> 
> Frank.
>    ----
> 
> PS: shall we discuss our logo next ? :-)
> 
Received on Friday, 23 November 2001 14:29:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:46 GMT