Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > I also think it's a good idea. Again, the draft could specify what the > server MUST support, depending on what standards it has implemented. > E.g. if the server has implemented both DeltaV and property data types, > MUST it return whatever data typing information it has in REPORT responses? OK. Issue and resolution: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-latest.html#rfc.issue.other-method-semantics>: "6. Changes for other methods Servers that support other methods using the DAV:multistatus response format (such as the REPORT method defined in [RFC3253], section 3.6) SHOULD apply the same extensions as defined in Section 5." Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 16:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:10 GMT