FengAndy@aol.com wrote: > There are many XPath implementation available. For simiplicity, we could Yes, but do they perform well on the typical layout of a CMS? > limit to a subset of XPath grammar. By adopting XPath or its subset, it > should make WebDAV more easily adopted. I tend to disagree. XPath makes the spec very simple, but an efficient implementation *very* complicated. > In future, if MSFT's longhorn becomes reality, search will be key for > WebDAV. Have any of you looked into Longhorn schema definition? It > offers many many metadata on files/documents/media, quite an opposite of > current Windows FS. To support such an environment, WebDAV overall may > need to be extended. In which way...? > BTW, is there anyone implementing WebDAV SEARCH? Yes. SAP, Software AG, Xythos, the Catacomb developers... Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 13:05:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:10 GMT