W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: SEARCH by last path segment, Was: SEARCH for displayname

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:55:37 +0100
Message-ID: <3FBC9DA9.4000202@gmx.de>
To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org

Elias Sinderson wrote:

> What needs to be clarified is the relative ordering of evaluating 
> include and exclude elements of a DASL request. Whereas AND operations 
> are generally unaffected by the order of their evaluation, this fails to 
> hold when you AND together set operations (union, intersection, and the 
> like). If you would like me to provide an example of why this is the 
> case, I'd be happy to...


I think the rules we're defining do not depend on evaluation order. 
Rephrasing Martin's definition with set arithmetics:

1) res = all
2) res = all - excluded
3) res = included
4) res = included - excluded


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 05:55:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:10 GMT