W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: SEARCH by last path segment, Was: SEARCH for displayname

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:17:26 +0100
Message-ID: <3FBA8C66.9080405@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Cc: "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, 'Kevin Wiggen' <kwiggen@xythos.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> 
>>>Why have an architectural principle that holds us back, if 
>>
>>it doesn't 
>>
>>>give us something in return?
>>
>>It does. For instance, it allows us to define how locks and multiple 
>>bindings interact in a logical way.
> 
> 
> This is exactly what I'm looking to understand, that I don't currently
> understand.  In fact, I thought that the interaction of locks and 
> multiple bindings was problematic.  So how does this make them work
> together in a logical way?

Looking at the latest GULP 
(<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/0367.html>), 
it nicely explains how locks work without even mentioning them specifically.

Maybe you could re-read it and suggest what is unclear?

Regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 16:18:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:10 GMT