> > Why have an architectural principle that holds us back, if > it doesn't > > give us something in return? > > It does. For instance, it allows us to define how locks and multiple > bindings interact in a logical way. This is exactly what I'm looking to understand, that I don't currently understand. In fact, I thought that the interaction of locks and multiple bindings was problematic. So how does this make them work together in a logical way? LisaReceived on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 16:09:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:10 GMT