Lisa Dusseault wrote: >>Well, a redirect is not a mapping, but just points to a >>mapping. Now, what is a "pseudo-bind access"? >> >>In the bind spec, all bindings are created equal... > > > Yes, but in an implementation, that may not be the case. In previous Then that's a broken implementation. > versions of the bind spec, I seem to recall, not all bindings were The binding spec hasn't change in this regard since the first last-call in 2000. > equal. And binding is not a standard yet. We may have problems > with the model that all bindings are created equal. No. It's a *feature* that they are. This may mean that the model used by BIND isn't applicable to a specific problem, and that's fine. For instance, there are also "redirect references" (separate protocol). Historically, there was also talk about "direct reference resources" but as far as I can tell from the mailing list archives, nobody was interested in pursueing that. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:51:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT