- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:18:47 +0100
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>
- Cc: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
Am 12.11.2003 um 18:07 schrieb Lisa Dusseault: >> >>> However the spec actually says properties >>> describe "the state of" the resource. That state could include its >>> URL mappings or primary mapping or current mapping. >> >> What is the meaning of "primary mapping"? I have never seen that. >> > > It's not a defined term, I wasn't trying to be rigorous. If you have > a system in which a resource has one URL which provides normal access, > and other URLs which provide "redirect" or pseudo-bind access, you Well, a redirect is not a mapping, but just points to a mapping. Now, what is a "pseudo-bind access"? In the bind spec, all bindings are created equal... Best Regards, Stefan > could consider that normal URL to be the primary mapping. > >> Regards, Stefan >> >>> lisa >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:57 PM >>>> To: Lisa Dusseault >>>> Cc: 'Wallmer, Martin'; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org >>>> Subject: Re: SEARCH for displayname >>>> >>>> >>>> Lisa Dusseault wrote: >>>>> Julian, you keep saying there are no URL properties. Where >>>> do you get >>>>> this dogma from? URL properties could be useful, are >>>> implemented, and >>>>> are not forbidden as far as I know. >>>>> >>>>> You may feel there *should* be no URL properties but it's >>>> misleading >>>>> to state that as fact. >>>> >>>> RFC2518 clearly states that it's the resource that has properties, >>>> not the URL (section 4). >>>> >>>> Regards, Julian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >>>> >>>> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:22:45 UTC