- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:11:34 -0800
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Wallmer, Martin'" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> > As long as we're discussing URI mappings that have been created on a > server that complies to the BIND sppec (and this how we got > here), this > is incorrect. It is very clear that the mappings are part of > the state > of the collection, not of the resource they map to. Again, how is that the case? What text makes that clear? If it's in the bind spec, that's not a standard yet and I don't agree with that "clarification". For that matter, a 'parent-path' property would be useful too. It would be a context-sensitive property like 'last-path-segment', but there are many potential context-sensitive live properties. 'getcontentlength' is one of those - a dynamic resource may well behave differently depending on what URL is used to access it. Lisa
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:11:58 UTC