Wallmer, Martin wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't want to introduce properties to the URI. If this should be > allowed or makes sense is a different discussion. What I want to say is: > the last path segment logically belongs to the URI and is NOT a property > of the resource. Correct, so this is a separate discussion. I just wanted to clarify that therefore the subject "SEARCH for displayname" is misleading (I just change it). If a client wants to search by DAV:displayname, it can easily do that with the existing DAV:basicsearch grammar (however it should expect resources not to have a DAV:displayname). Regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 04:21:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT