W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > July to September 2003

RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the draft

From: Wallmer, Martin <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:38:01 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106063A904E@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: "'yamuna prakash'" <yamunap@hotmail.com>, "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, julian.reschke@gmx.de
Cc: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Hi Prakash,

of course multiple scopes give additional possibilites. But we should keep
DASL lightweight. Do you have a usecase for multiple scopes?


-----Original Message-----
From: yamuna prakash [mailto:yamunap@hotmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 29. September 2003 21:18
To: Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com; julian.reschke@gmx.de
Cc: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the

I was hoping you could elaborate on your anwser. Even in a tree, the 
combination of scope and depth vs. multiple scopes are not equivalent.


>>2. Ability to specify multiple scope(s) in the from clause
>>The from clause is defined as follows: <!ELEMENT from          (scope) > 
>><!ELEMENT scope         (href, depth) >
>>This definition seems to preclude searching in multiple scopes, I was 
>>wondering if there is a mechanis by which I can specify multiple scopes. 
>>If currently none exist, is there a plan to support it in the future?

>Not yet. How do others feel about it? I guess the original authors wanted 
>to keep DAV:basicsearch as simple as possible, thus the restriction to a 
>single scope.

Currently I don't see a need for multiple scopes.


MSN Hotmail now on your Mobile phone. 
http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/mobilesms/ Click here.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 01:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:43 UTC