- From: Wallmer, Martin <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:50:17 +0100
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Hi, I vote for 2 as well, Martin -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 20:45 To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org Subject: Treatment of properties with mixed/element content (section 5.5.4) Does this mean "undefined" as 1) "not defined by this specification" or 2) as in SQL's three-valued logic ? For the sake of interoperability, I'd vote for 2). If an implementation wants to support matching in mixed/element content, it will then have to *explicitly* extend DAV:basicsearch. Julian [1] <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html#no n-simple-types> -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2002 04:50:31 UTC