W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: next steps / open issues in DASL framework

From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:30:13 -0800
Message-Id: <>
To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
At 02:11 AM 3/13/2002 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:

>We still need to decide whether we want a standard way to discover search
>arbiters that *are* known for a particular resource. I'd say as long it's
>optional and the list doesn't need to be exhaustive, it won't hurt.

I think it's out of scope, but if you propose something that is cheap, 
optional, and non-controversial, it's okay.

The risk is that you will propose something controversial, and then pay the 
price of another two weeks of delay getting concensus.  That's the only 
risk I think.

it's your call.  I do not object.
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 20:30:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:42 UTC