Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi, > > The original WebDAV DASL working group doesn't exist anymore, and the last > DASL working draft has expired. After collecting (and partly) resolving > issues for some time, I have been advised by Jim Whitehead (chair of the > WebDAV WG) to change my current version of the draft into an individual > submission and to "re-open" the discussion over here. To avoid confusion, > this draft is simply called "WebDAV SEARCH" (rather than "DASL"). > > The current (unfinished and unsubmitted) version can be found at: > > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html> Read through it, thanks for the work Julian. > The top priorities right now seem to be: > > - get together people who have implemented or are planning to implement the > WebDAV SEARCH method in clients and servers <Raising hand...> > - identify currently open issues and resolve them Okay, well this isn't really an issue, but more a simple error in the current working draft: All the incomplete XML examples should really use the namespace prefix D: as opposed to d: in the sake of consistency. The first examples in the text use xmlns:D="DAV:", so the examples given further in the text should really use that convention as well. Sorry if this seems nit-picky, hopefully you'll see my point. :-) Searchingly yours, EliasReceived on Friday, 1 February 2002 01:50:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT