W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional

From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:46:39 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>

At 01:14 PM 6/24/2002 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:

>does anybody remember the reason why DAV:isdefined is an *optional*

I don't remember, and a search of the archived mail 
does not show anything either.

So I can only guess: either someone objected (verbally) that it was 
expensive to implement or it was a mistake.

Are you asking from curiousity, or do you want to propose that it be mandatory?
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 11:46:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:43 UTC