W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Rationale for DAV:isdefined to be optional

From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:46:39 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020624084152.01b73ec0@127.0.0.1>
To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>

At 01:14 PM 6/24/2002 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:

>Hi,
>
>does anybody remember the reason why DAV:isdefined is an *optional*
>operator?
>
>Julian

I don't remember, and a search of the archived mail 
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=www-webdav-dasl
does not show anything either.

So I can only guess: either someone objected (verbally) that it was 
expensive to implement or it was a mistake.

Are you asking from curiousity, or do you want to propose that it be mandatory?
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 11:46:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT